Palin is a Sad and Moldering Strangeness?
So we should gather from the hit piece by Michael Gross appearing in the October issue of Vanity Fair magazine, that Sarah Palin is “a monster?”
To sum up some of the warped views of the radical far-left, left left, mid-left, moderate left, and near left, we are suppose to believe that Sarah is: a bad tipper, lazy, unprepared, dumb, abusive, tempermental, vengeful, crazy, a liar, an airhead, “unhinged,” paranoid, a bad mom, an overprotective mom, a faux hunter, and (my favorite) that anywhere you peel back the skin of Sarah Palin’s life, a sad and moldering strangeness lies beneath..” Whatever that means.
But here’s the interesting part: the VF article is predictably negative, but its the reactions of others on the left that are astounding. They are responding to the article with their own disbelief of the constant lies. Lefties are even showing signs of morals, of embarrassment of unfounded smears, of a sudden realization that it is they who are looking ridiculous, and not the mama grizzly moose hunter.
Pro-abortion radical Monika Bauerlein of Mother Jones MOCKS what the VF writer views as a human train wreck: “Sarah, these aides say, seemed comforted by having the children around, and she seemed lonely when they were gone.” Truly a monster.
A happy, fullfilled Christian woman, former Governor, bestselling author, popular celebrity, mother of five kids, wife of a most excellent and handsome husband, fit, beautiful, healthy, and now wealthy … does that describe a sad and moldering strangeness?
