If Barack announced he was Chinese…
…would his followers believe him? What if he stood up before 10,000 people and stated flatly, “I am not black, I am Chinese,” would his kool-aid drinking followers accept it without question?
That kind of blatant lie is what Obama is reduced to – not even THE ONE can fathom that his sheeple hang on his every lying word. He’s told such whoopers lately that the communist rags The New York Times and The Washington Post have guffawed in amazement. Check this out:
In an editorial by the leftist New Hampshire Union-Leader, the observed:
On Thursday, Obama said of McCain, “He has consistently opposed the sorts of common-sense regulations that might have lessened the current crisis.” That’s entirely untrue.
As The Washington Post pointed out in an editorial on Friday, McCain in fact has supported many new regulations of financial institutions, including some that Obama opposed. “In 2006, he pushed for stronger regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — while Mr. Obama was notably silent,” The Post wrote.
That was a substantive re-arrangement of the facts by Obama. Newspapers aren’t buying it.
This isn’t a sly lipstick-on-a-pig comment. This is an outright accuse your opponent of doing what you actually did.
[H]ere he is violating his own professed standards. This is not the Barack Obama so many voters in New Hampshire and elsewhere thought they knew. But it is the real Barack Obama. For despite his rhetoric, he is in fact campaigning so dishonestly that even The Washington Post and The New York Times have called him on it. Which means that he is in practice no different from those regular politicians against whom his entire campaign has been built.
